Some of you might remember a very old cooking adventure of mine, 5-minute chocolate cake, aka chocolate cake in a mug. It was an experiment using one of those email memes that have been going around forever, telling you that you can make a mini chocolate cake with just a mug and a microwave. It turned out... okay. Not so great that I ever made it again, but not so terrible that I wasn't willing to eat it that first time.

Enter today, and a random article I found online listing 18 microwave snacks you can make in a mug. Friends, I couldn't let this pass. I wanted to make all of them. Every single one. For science. And posterity.

Instead, I settled on the cinnamon roll in a mug. It was ridiculously simple, using only common stuff that any self-respecting baker would have in her house. (Except maybe the cream cheese for the icing and the applesauce, both of which which I did thankfully have). It was quite fast, though not quite the three minutes the article implies, at least not if you have to take down all the ingredients, measure them, and put them back. Still, quite fast, all things considered.

The only deviances I made from the recipe was using regular milk instead of buttermilk, and field-berry applesauce because I had some of the mott's snack cups floating around. (Bonus points: eating the rest of the snack cup while the cinnamon roll "bakes.")

I mixed up the icing inside a plastic sandwich bag (smushing it around with my hands), and snipped off the corner so that I could pipe it into the mug. It was horribly messy, not even close to the beautiful spiral in the picture, but it was tasty, and that's the important thing.

The other important thing is that this recipe was surprisingly tasty! It might not be restaurant-quality cake, it might not even be cinnabon quality cake... but it was very tasty. Especially with the frosting. I would definitely make this again. But not too much, because there are 17 other recipes to try. *grin*
In my continuing quest to learn to cook, I'm using two main sources: a lifetime membership to Rouxbe, and the much cheaper book The 4-Hour Chef, by Tim Ferriss. Tonight was an adventure from the latter source. His first adventure, you might say.

See, instead of most cookbooks (even most beginner cookbooks) that might have a whole bunch of appetizers, then a whole bunch of soups, then a whole bunch of poultry dishes and so on, Ferriss organizes the main section of his book ("Domestic") from easy to less-easy. A list of the recipe titles, in order, can be found here (pdf). You might notice the first one is Osso "Buko", a sort of cheater's version of Ossobuco. Ferriss calls this "an amazing standby dish that will never fail you." I decided to give it a try.

Ferriss has a general rule in the "Domestic" chapter: no more than 5 ingredients per meal (not counting garlic, salt, pepper, and oil). The ingredients in this one are lamb shanks, carrots, tomatoes, and white wine. You'd think, with only four ingredients, this would be pretty easy. Despite that, three of the four gave me a hard time:

Continued behind here )
Recipe )
Final verdict )
The evening of New Year's Day, I was playing D&D. And since I was at the host's house pretty much all day, I decided it might be nice to have some baked goods for the game. Specifically, chai gingerbread bars, because the host had indicated that he likes them, and I aim to please.

Now, this is a recipe that I've made quite a number of times, am quite comfortable with, and figured it wouldn't be too much of a problem, except for one small thing: my friend isn't a baker.

Among the ingredients he did not have:
- flour (all-purpose or whole wheat)
- any of the spices except cinnamon
- brown sugar
- vanilla extract
- non-stick spray (vital to working with this recipe's very sticky dough)

There was some baking soda in the fridge that my friend was worried was no longer good, but a quick test (put baking soda in a glass with some vinegar and see if it becomes a mini-volcano) revealed that it was still fine, so at least that was one thing we didn't need to worry about.

For the rest, we wound up finding a tiny bag (1 kg) of all-purpose flour and some brown sugar at the convenience store in his building, and -- on a tip from a friend -- I used rum instead of vanilla extract. (Truth be told, I used a bit too much, because I couldn't figure out how the damn bottle poured.) We doubled-up on the chai to counteract the lack of other spices, so things were mostly okay on the ingredient front.

Then I realized we were also missing quite a number of tools I take for granted. There was no kitchen scale, which I'd kind of figured would be the case and didn't mind too much. I brushed off some old knowledge to measure the butter, i.e. using water displacement in a liquid measuring cup. There were measuring spoons, which was good, but (and here's the kicker) no dry measuring cups. Eventually we found one that was 125 ml, which is close enough to a half-cup that I could make it work, but I was flabber-boggled.

There wasn't a stand mixer, which is fine; I'm used to making most of my baked goods by hand anyway. There was one large mixing bowl and one that was just big enough to hold the dry ingredients if I didn't stir too vigorously. I greased the pan with some of the extra butter.

The pan. Oh, yes, I should mention the pan. See, this recipe is meant to be made in a 9x13 pan. My friend didn't have one. What he had instead was an 8x8 casserole dish with high walls. I had no idea how this would affect cooking time or outcome, and it didn't help that we also didn't have an oven thermometer. ("Why would I think the temperature was anything other than what's listed on the dial?" asked my friend.)

So anyway: the dough looked okay. We put it in the casserole dish. We set the dial on the oven to 350, waited a while, and then put it in. I turned it at around 13 minutes, and then checked again at 25 -- not done, but the top was starting to brown quite alarmingly. Brushing off more cobwebbed cooking skills, I took some tin foil and put it over the top of the dish. Put it back in for 5 minutes, then 5 more, then 5 more.

The damn thing refused to be done. It always seemed like it was almost done, and sometimes it seemed that parts of it were done and other parts weren't, but it was never entirely done. I had the casserole dish in the oven for over an hour, and it still refused to be ready.

After a while, I figured out that the tin foil over the top of the dish was causing the crust on top to start turning mushy in the middle, so I took over the foil, let it bake for another five minutes, and then took it out.

It was fine... for about five minutes, when the top collapsed, revealing that the inside was absolutely not done yet. I started to become seriously frustrated and annoyed. My friend, bless him, came up with a solution I wouldn't have: mash the whole thing up and then put it back in the oven for a few minutes until it finishes baking. Which is what I did.

In the end, it turned out very tasty, though it was more of a crumble than bars. We served it over ice cream, and it was well received, so I'll count this one as a net win. It certainly was a test of my kitchen improvisation skills, and I take it as a mark of my increasing comfort as a baker that I was able to improvise so much with what I had on hand. It also made me appreciate all the more my own very well-stocked kitchen. Next time I do baking, I'll just bring it over. :)
So, here's the thing. We had a lovely Christmas dinner with Ian's family, and brought home quite a lot of leftovers: turkey, stuffing, cranberry sauce, etc. Most of it got eaten in fairly short order, as tasty the second time round as the first. But the mashed potatoes... they didn't reheat very well. And we had a fairly large container of them. I didn't want to waste them, but I didn't really want to eat them, either. What to do, what to do...

I did as I always did in this circumstances, I asked The Google. And The Google told me a whole bunch of things I could do with leftover mashed potatoes, but the one that really piqued my interest was gnocchi. See, gnocchi are my favorite pasta, bar none, and if I could do this properly, life would be sweet indeed. (Sweet and savory. Because gnocchi are best with butter and sage.)

A tour of quite a number of cooking sites revealed that this was going to be more "test and see how it turns out" than I'm used to. I prefer to use precise recipes, and this one... well, this was gonna be anything but.

In any event, I took the 2-ish cups of (cold) mashed potatoes, cracked in an egg, and stirred that around for a while. Then I added a cup of flour, mixed it some more, figured it wasn't quite enough, and added a little more. Dumped the whole thing out and kneaded it for a while until it became (as the recipes instructed) a sticky dough. I had no idea whether it was too sticky, too smooth, or whatever, but I figured if I could roll it out into strips, it was good enough.

And roll I did! Into about 8 "snakes," which I then cut up into little "pillows," that seemed to be pretty delicate. Didn't bother running them over a gnocchi board (because I don't own one) or the tines of a fork (because they seemed too delicate), so I just left them as-is. Popped them into boiling water in three batches, and boiled until they rose to the top and then another 2-3 minutes past that, about 5 minutes overall. Drained for a while on paper towels, then served with butter and sage.

They were pretty soft (though they're firming up as they cool down) and very filling, as gnocchi tend to be. I have no idea why they were so soft: too much or too little flour, too long or too short a cooking time, too much handling... no clue. But it worked out.

In the end, this isn't the sort of recipe I'd make every day -- because I have no interest in boiling up potatoes solely to use as gnocchi when store-bought gnocchi is both more convenient and better quality -- but if I ever find myself with some extra mashed potatoes lying around, it's certainly the sort of thing I can see myself making again. Success!
Today while browsing my various feeds, I stumbled across the welfare food challenge. It's a campaign run by Raise the Rates, a BC-based community organization trying to get welfare rates increased. The idea behind the challenge is to spend no more than $26 on food for one week, as this is the amount allocated for food by the BC government.

I've always been a fan of lifestyle experiments (reading about them, not conducting them), so I'll be very interested in seeing how the participants on this one turn out. It's all the more interesting because I've seen this type of experiment done before. Twice. With vastly different results.

More on that behind here. Somewhat long. )
One failure and one success! (Eh, can't win 'em all.) To start with the failure...

1. Cranberry Chicken

I admit, I was worried about the cranberry chicken pretty much as soon as I put it in the bag. It's little more than chicken, apples, cranberry sauce, an onion, and some flavoring agents (lemon, honey, etc.). It made a lot less than the other recipes, only enough for dinner for me and Marc and a half-serving of leftovers. But that's okay, because it wasn't very good.

It might be that we cooked it too long. The directions are for 8 hours on low, and we probably had it in the crock pot around 10, but this was clearly Much Too Long. Despite being in a slow cooker all day, the meat was tough (i.e. overcooked) and the taste was... meh. Tart and sweet, but not in a good way. We ate our portions for dinner (reluctantly), but neither of us touched the leftovers. So this one -- not so much a keeper.


2. Beef Stew

This one, on the other hand, went quite well. It's admittedly kind of hard to screw up beef stew (recipe here), but still. It's always nice when things come together, especially after the cranberry chicken disaster. The taste is good, it's very hearty, and it makes enough for dinner plus another 2-3 servings. Putting it from the freezer to the fridge last night wasn't quite enough time to defrost it, but it's okay. Ten hours in a crock pot means that it was fine.

The one change I'd make next time is to add some barley. There's a lot of liquid in this recipe, and I think adding in a 1/2-cup of barley when I toss everything into the crock pot (not in the freezer bag -- I don't think barley freezes that well) would do just the trick.

In any case, we had this with some baguette for dinner, and... yum! Just what we needed on a cold day like today. This one's a keeper.


So we're now halfway through the recipes I made for the first batch. Still to go: fajitas, taco soup, cilantro-lime chicken, and BBQ chicken. Clearly, our meals are gonna be somewhat Mexican-inspired for the next few weeks...
Trial #2 with the freezer/crock pot cooking was sausage and peppers (recipe here). Sadly, unlike trial #1 (coconut curry chicken), I probably won't keep this one in my recipe book. It was... okay. Ish. Quite acidic, and the consistency isn't the crisp, dry sausage that you like to get in sausage-and-peppers, but more, well, crock pot-y. Moist.

Also, unlike the coconut curry chicken, this one looks like it might only make 4 or so servings, even with rice. (Maybe only 3 Marc-sized servings.) We had enough for dinner for both of us with Marc taking seconds, and I'll have enough for lunch tomorrow, and then there's probably enough left for Marc's lunch, and that's it.

*shrugs* Can't win 'em all. I'll keep "sausage and peppers" on my list of things to make when I've got time to actually cook the sausage properly in the frying pan, but it won't be on my list of crock pot meals. Oh, well. Tomorrow: cranberry chicken.
Thanks to my friend Kim, I was inspired to try something I've never done before: freezer cooking. The idea is that you prep a bunch of veggies, meats, etc. (uncooked), freeze them in freezer bags, and then when you're ready to eat them, you defrost and toss them in the crock pot. Given that one of my problems recently has been the dreaded "I have no idea what I want for dinner" demon, I figured I'd give this a try.

More on the prep )

Meal trial #1: Coconut curry chicken )
Okay, I may have just stumbled across the world's greatest biscuit recipe. Since trying to make biscuits for the first time last month, I've been playing around with the recipe. I wasn't 100% happy with it. It was pleasant enough, but it was a bit tough and a bit lacking in sweetness.

After a number of different experiments, I think I just hit the home run. Unlike the first time, they're very fluffy, decently sweet, and absolutely divine hot. I haven't tried them at room temperature yet, and I suspect if Marc were here, they wouldn't last that long. (I've got guests coming over at some point, so the biscuits may not make it that long anyway.)

In any case, here's the new and updated recipe. Because I love you and want you to be happy like I am. (And, yes, I convert all my recipes to weight values. It means I only have one spoon and one bowl to clean up at the end of my baking.)

The recipe )
Today, I came home with a need to eat something warm and bread-like, but not grainy like the whole-grain loaf I've got in my pantry. Ideally I wanted something like naan, but I was pretty much willing to settle for anything. So I started hunting around my various saved links and came upon an idea: biscuits. I've never made biscuits before, but from what I can tell, they're fast, they're easy, and they don't require too many esoteric ingredients. (I *do* own some dry active yeast, but I have yet to build up the courage to use it.)

After reading through a bunch of recipes, I decided upon this one, because it didn't involve any rolling out of dough (I don't have a proper surface for it at the moment), didn't involve "frozen" butter (as I'd found in another recipe) or buttermilk (which I can make, but it's one extra step I didn't feel like doing), and didn't require futzing around with cookie cutters (see the "rolling out of dough" comment above).

A few surprises:
- 2 tsp of butter is really very little, more like a pat you'd get in one of those little containers at restaurants.
- Melted butter + cold milk = congealing butter. I meant to do that. I think.
- My oven didn't want to go up to 450. I settled on 400, and baked for about 14 minutes.

In the end, this was super-fast and super-easy. The longest part was actually pre-heating the oven, which took about 6 minutes longer than putting together the dough. The recipe (amounts as given, not doubled) made eight large-ish biscuits, which are doughy and wonderful.

Marc and I agree that there needs to be a bit more salt and something to add sweetness to the dough. Next time, I'll up the salt to 1/4 tsp and add 3 tbsp of honey and see how that comes out.

All that said, this recipe's a keeper, if only because it's so easy that I now know I can satisfy my "hot and bread-like" cravings (which I get on a fairly regular basis) with a minimum of fuss. Marc and I ate four right out of the oven, slathered with some butter, which is saying something about their deliciousness.

Whether the other four will last until tomorrow morning, and how they fare after they've cooled down, I can't say. But even if they're no good tomorrow, I can always halve the recipe in the future to give us a tasty little snack with dinners. Yay biscuits!
Okay, I admit it. I made these cookies purely based off the picture on the website. They look SO GOOD! And, as a bonus, all the measurements are already in grams, which is the way I like them. (I pretty much convert all my baking recipes to weight instead of volume the first time I make them. Saves a ton of hassle when you can do everything in one bowl without measuring cups.)

The one hiccup I had was that I didn't have any "golden syrup," which is apparently very common in the UK but much less so in North America. Nor did I have corn syrup to use as a replacement. In the end, I substituted an equal amount (1/3 cup, or 105 g) of maple syrup, because that's what I had.

This recipe makes a lot of very small cookies, about 15-17 g / 1 level tbsp each. For me, it made four dozen exactly. Thankfully, they also don't spread too much, so I was able to put two dozen on a single baking sheet and finish the whole thing in two batches. My powdered sugar coating came out blotchier than in the picture, probably because I just whisked the powdered sugar and didn't actually sift it. Still, it looked nice enough, even if it did leave my counter covered in icing sugar.

Final verdict: tasty! A bit odd if you're not expecting the spice, which hits at the back of the mouth, but tasty! And addictive! Because they're so little, you can go through quite a lot in one sitting. I'd make these again, for sure.
It's my friend's birthday tomorrow, and she specifically requested that there be chocolate cupcakes at the game today to celebrate. With a request like that, how could I refuse? The only problem is that I've never really made chocolate cupcakes before and had no idea what I was doing.

I decided to use her own recipe and immediately ran into confusion: what temperature to set the oven? The first line of the recipe says to preset it to 375, but the last line says to bake for 15 minutes at 400. What's a girl to do? I set it somewhere in the middle and called it good.

It also occurred to me after I started pouring that I really should have used my jumbo paper molds instead of the regulars -- there's a lot of batter in this recipe, so much so that I was wondering whether it's meant to produce 24 cupcakes instead of 12. (The recipe doesn't say.) In fact, some of the batter crept down a bit over the side of the molds, meaning that the paper is going to be obnoxious to get off.

Furthermore, the cupcakes weren't even close to done at 15 minutes. I checked every 3 minutes thereafter, and it took until 27 minutes before a toothpick wasn't coming out coated in batter. (In retrospect, I possibly should have baked them for a minute or two less. They're a touch overdone.)

Next question: icing. Just as I'd never made cupcakes before, I don't really have a go-to icing recipe either. I decided to try this one from the Tasty Kitchen Blog because it sounded really amazing. Sadly, it's also a pain in the ass, particularly if you don't have an electric mixer. No joke: baking is a better workout than going to the gym. My arm is so sore.

It's tasty, don't get me wrong. It's the sort of thing I could eat right out of the bowl and just ignore the cupcakes. But I'm pretty sure that even after a good ten minutes of stirring it by hand, it still wasn't quite at the right "whipped cream" consistency.

In any event, this is not a dietetic day in "adventures in cooking" land. Between the two recipes, I used a full pound of butter. I think I gained five pounds just by reading them. And even though I think I slightly overbaked things and didn't whip the icing long enough, it's hard to completely mess up chocolate cupcakes.

Final verdict: I'll probably make the cupcakes again, but the icing recipe will have to go back on the shelf until I get an electric mixer. I'm sure I can find something easier that doesn't dirty two large bowls and a saucepan in the process.

More news after game tonight.
Man, was I a klutz tonight. If a thing could be dropped, spilled, knocked into something else, or used to cut my hand open, it was. (Don't ask about that last one. Just trust me.) Thankfully, that didn't seem to affect the outcome of the cookies, which all turned out fine.

On tonight's agenda was supposed to be one batch of spritz cookies (out of two), but Marc was around and willing to help, and they actually went pretty fast because you can fit a whole lot of spritz cookies on a baking sheet at once. (They don't spread; I think we were able to fit about three dozen per sheet.) So, as per last year, I made up the batch and manipulated the cookie press, and Marc put the sprinkles. Working at a moderate pace, we were able to get everything done (including cooling and putting away) in about two and a half hours, which I think is pretty darn good. I think in the end we have 12-15 dozen. I didn't count precisely. (Too much happening too fast.)

It's good that Marc was home too, because I needed his manly hand strength to open the cookie press a few times. I don't know why it sealed so tightly, but it did. (And before anyone asks, yes, I did use the "wrap a towel around it" trick. No dice.)

Of all the cookie doughs I've made so far, these were probably the easiest, and aside from putting on the sprinkles, the fastest to prep. They were also fastest to cook, though this was a bit trickier. For some reason, all the batches took different amounts of time. Some were overbaked at six and a quarter minutes, others were underbaked at seven and a half. Still, they all came out fine, and none were burnt, so all's well.

And that, I think, is that. Unless I want to do my super-secret special project, I'm pretty much done until I have to package everything up. I've got twenty or so recipients, who should be receiving about 30-32 cookies each. Which is pretty good for a Christmas present, I think.

Excuse me while I collapse now.
For a variety of time-related reasons, I find myself needing to buy lunches for most of this week. And while I generally try to be frugal, some of the lunch deals come with tea (or, rather, coffee that I replace with tea). Now, when I'm bringing lunches from home, I have an afternoon snack consisting of a baked good and my favorite black tea from DavidsTea, Buttered Rum. But I figured if I was going to be getting bland bag tea with my meals anyway, I might as well try to spice them up.

Fortuitous, then, that my RSS reader should deliver this recipe for chai concentrate. It's pretty simple, really: one tin of sweetened condensed milk with a bunch of spices stirred in. Conveniently, I happened to have a tin of sweetened condensed milk sitting on my pantry shelf, a relic from last Channukah when I got a book of dessert recipes, many of which called for condensed milk. I meant to bake the recipes, never got around to it, and so I had this tin of condensed milk that was looking for a use. (It's good until September 2012. I checked.)

For one thing, I'd never used sweetened condensed milk before. Until now, I'd really only ever heard it referenced in Good Omens. (Shadwell drinks it a lot.) It's... very thick. Much thicker than I expected. More the consistency of honey than milk. Also, it's very sticky. I stirred in the spices and put it in a 250-ml mason jar to bring to work. (Only replacement: replaced the cardamom, which I didn't have, with 1/4 tsp ground ginger.)

Bought some tea with my lunch and tried it out. It's... okay. It lends the milk and sugar and a bit of spice to the tea, but it's not really "chai." And when you get down near the bottom, it's very granular because of all the spices that have settled there.

Will I finish the container? Probably, given that it lasts 6 months in the fridge. Will I ever make more? Probably not.
Yet again, another day without a major catastrophe. The plan today was to bake the four batches of snickerdoodles I prepped yesterday. I had a suspicion, though, that it would take me longer to roll out a dozen balls, coat them in cinnamon-sugar, and squish them down than I'd have available to me if I were going full-tilt in baking. I did a timed test run around 10:30, and, indeed, it took too long. (About 3-4 minutes, when I've only got two and a half.) So I spent an hour rolling seventeen dozen dough balls, all ready to go. The dough softened up quite a bit over the course of this, so I put all the dough balls into the fridge to cool down for a while.

It took me a while to figure out the right timing for these cookies. Eight minutes was clearly too long, seven just a touch too short. I wound up settling on 7 minutes and 15 seconds, which worked out okay. I think the sugar on the bottom of the cookie was throwing me off a bit, but I sampled two (for science!) and they taste great, so I'm not too worried.

In any case, the first batch went into the oven around 11:30 the last came out around 2:00. Given another 15-20 minutes to cool off the last batches, and I figure I've been in the hot kitchen about four and a half hours today. I have no idea how Marc's mom manages her 9-hour baking marathons. I'm pooped!

Thankfully, no prep to do now. I'm off tomorrow -- I've got D&D, and one must have priorities in life -- and then Tuesday and Wednesday I'll be making spritz cookies, which don't need a long chill time.

My mom will be over shortly to pick up all the cookies I've made so far to store them at her house. She's got a large freezer and I've got a teeny-tiny one. Thanks, Mom! (And I'm sorry I'm putting temptation in your way!) So that's it for now. I think it's time to head out to the local cafe for lunch and typing up yesterday's lines of the night from Game of Thrones.
Today's baking was long but thankfully uneventful. I realized last night that I was running low on quite a few things, or at least would run low if I made four batches of snickerdoodles as opposed to the three I was planning. So my wonderful, wonderful mother came over this morning with a bagful of baking staples (flour, sugar, vanilla, butter, wax paper, etc.) and also some large containers I could put the finished cookies in.

I started baking around 10:00, and finished around 1:30. The bigger cookies (and bigger here, obviously, is only comparative) took about 9 minutes each; the smaller ones somewhere between 7 1/2 and 8. Which pretty much meant I got 2-3 minutes of free time per cookie batch, all things considered. But thankfully there were no disastrous events, no injuries... just lots and lots of time. Twenty-five dozen chocolate chip cookies. Whew!

Then I made up two double-batches of snickerdoodle dough, to bake tomorrow. And now I'm done. Time to play Game of Thrones.
Today's game plan (slightly modified from originally intended): prepare chocolate chip cookies batch #2 and #3, roll all chocolate chip cookies into dough balls.

The first part of this plan was quite simple, actually. Learning from Wednesday's minor inefficiencies, I made sure I had the eggs at room temperature, the butter nice and soft, and the big bowls out and ready to go. I had to refill the flour container and open a new bag of chocolate chips, but everything went pretty swimmingly.

My original plan had been to bake a batch of the chocolate chip cookies tonight, but since I have a few hours more tomorrow than anticipated, I decided to put it off. Instead, I chose to roll all the dough into balls so that I could just put them on the baking sheets tomorrow and go. (Because of the relatively short baking time, the need to turn them midway through, and the fact that I only have two good baking sheets and am constantly in motion while baking, I like to have the dough in ready-to-go balls beforehand.)

This, my friends, took time. A lot of time.

The dough that had been sitting in the fridge since Wednesday (batch #1) was quite hard and required a bit of force to pry apart with a spoon in order to roll. Batches #2 and #3 went smoother, having only been in the fridge an hour or so when I took them out to roll them.

The good news is it's all done. The bad news is I think I may have messed up the sizes. I was anticipating (based on past results) that this dough would give me 5-6 dozen per batch. The first batch I rolled out gave me 10 dozen. (!) Deliberately rolling larger balls for the other two batches, I got slightly more than 7 dozen for each of them. So this means that instead of the intended 15-18 dozen cookies, I'll actually have about 25 dozen. Which is great in that my cookie recipients get more cookies each, and bad in that I have to sit around and bake them all tomorrow.

As I recall, these cookies don't spread too much. If I'm lucky, I'll be able to fit more than a dozen of the smaller ones on the tray at a time. Oh, well. We'll see what happens.

The plan for tomorrow (round two): Bake all 25 dozen chocolate chip cookies, prep 3-4 batches of snickerdoodles. Also: send Marc out for more sugar, because I think I'm going to run out. For now: sleep, glorious sleep.
I've got six days of holiday baking scheduled this year, not counting tonight. This is partly because I learned my lesson about 6-hour baking days last year, and partly because I simply don't have time to do very much baking on any given day, between work and various social commitments. I was getting so stressed for a while -- 40 dozen cookies in two weeks, with tons of other time commitments! -- that I made up a schedule of what I had to do on each day. Today's task: prep the first batch of chocolate chip cookies and get them chilling so I can bake them on Friday.

As I did last year, I'm prepping all the dough by hand, which takes a little longer but requires far less cleanup. (I truly hate cleaning my food processor, and I don't have a stand mixer of a hand mixer.)

In the end, it took me 25 minutes from the time I walked into the kitchen until I put the dough in the fridge. Not bad, all things considered. I was very smart and took the butter out of the fridge this morning, so it was super-soft and easy to work with by the time I came home this evening. Definitely gonna do that again. Sadly, forgot to take out the eggs when I started prepping, so I lost a few minutes bringing them up to room temperature. (Put eggs in large glass, put warm water in glass, swish eggs around a while, dump out water and replace with more warm water, repeat.)

I used smaller mixing bowls than usual (my 2nd and 3rd largest, instead of my two largest), which was a mistake. It works for other, smaller cookie recipes, but this one is too big. For the next two batches of this dough, I need the big bowls. In the end, I did the final mixing of the dough with my bare hands -- the wooden spoon wasn't getting the little flour bits off the bottom of the bowl. I mixed in the chocolate chips the same way.

So anyway, I've got dough in the fridge. It'll be baked on Friday and replaced by two more bundles of dough, etc ad nauseam for the next week and a half. And, yes, I'm going to be posting about it every time I bake. For posterity. If you don't like it, no one's forcing you to read.

For now, shower and bedtime. It's gonna be a long couple of weeks.
After last week's batch cooking success, I decided to try again. The plan for this week: some sort of tagine, some sort of chili or meat sauce, and some sort of baked good. My plan was to have everything done by Sunday afternoon. But we all know how it goes with plans...

Tagine, meat sauce, apple pudding, and a few gray hairs behind here )

And that's it. I've got two big containers of tagine, one and a half big containers of meat sauce, two big containers of rice, and about 3/4 of the apple pudding left to keep me for the week. Which is good, because so far I'm booked every evening from Monday to Thursday this week and have absolutely no idea when I'd cook otherwise.

I just hope that next week is less stressful. I'm not sure I can go through that again.
In an attempt to figure out what types of cookies I'll be baking for the holidays, I did a test run of two recipes yesterday.

- Chocolate crinkle cookies -- Let me first say that these are a pain in the ass to make by hand. You have to beat the eggs and sugar until they are "thick, pale, and fluffy," until the eggs fall back into the bowl in slow ribbons. While this might be fine with an electric mixer, doing it by hand is tiring! I melted the chocolate and butter in the microwave, using regular chocolate chippits, and that turned out fine. However, these cookies also needed to be refrigerated overnight, which added to the complication factor if I were planning on baking them for the holidays. As a final puzzle, I had a hard time telling when they were done. I cooked one dozen for 7 1/2 minutes and another for 9 1/2 minutes, and both seemed identical when we were eating them afterwards, maybe a touch underdone even at the 9 1/2 mark.

In the end, they were very soft and chewy, which is how I like my cookies. I thought they were very tasty, the sort of thing I might make if I had company coming over for a game or something, but they're too finicky for holiday baking.


- Snickerdoodles -- A good friend of mine used to have a stellar snickerdoodle recipe, but sadly she can't find it right now. I was pleased to note that this recipes uses baking powder instead of cream of tartar (which I've seen listed as an ingredient in many snickerdoodle recipes -- seriously, who stocks cream of tartar in their pantry?!). It was a straightforward recipe, quite easy, and I was easily able to tell when they were done. (About 8 minutes in my oven.) I find it much easier to tell when light-colored cookies are done, because you can see the browning on the edges. For dark-colored cookies, I have no idea.

When I presented these at the game, they were the winner compared to the chocolate crinkles. So... easier and tastier? We have a winner! I only worry that they might be too similar to the spritz and chocolate chip cookies I'm already including in my holiday baskets, but what the heck. More cookies is never a bad thing.

March 2018

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
1112 131415 16 17
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 12:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios